This item is accessible only to the Washington University community.

Off-Campus WUSTL Users: Click the “Off-Campus Download” button below. You will be prompted to log in using your WUSTL Key.

Language

English (en)

Date of Award

5-4-2012

Author's School

College of Arts & Sciences

Author's Department

International and Area Studies

Degree Name

Bachelor of Arts (A.B.)

Restricted/Unrestricted

Restricted

Abstract

Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) provides an interesting case study to think about immigrant women in France, and the ways in which they can participate in the feminist movement. Much of the controversy around FGM centers on two questions that seem to be asked frequently in France: what is the role of universalism; and, can immigrants integrate into French society? As the FGM debate shows, if immigrant women wish to participate in feminist action, their situation forces them to do so within the context of mainstream feminism. French feminism relies too heavily on universalist ideals for any form of multicultural, women-of-color feminism to be viable. Looking at white papers and educational campaigns produced by the French state and feminist associations, this study examines the feminist and universalist discourses that surround FGM in France, ultimately concluding that the FGM controversy reinforces the impossibility of women-of-color feminism in France.

Mentor

Seth Graebner

Comments

Accessibility Notice: This document is a scanned text that has been automatically processed using Python's Tesseract Optical Character Recognition (OCR) engine to provide a text alternative for assistive software. Formatting or character recognition discrepancies may exist.

Off-campus Download

Share

COinS