This item is accessible only to the Washington University community.
Off-Campus WUSTL Users: Click the “Off-Campus Download” button below. You will be prompted to log in using your WUSTL Key.
Public Opinion of Surveillance: Balancing Public Safety and Individual Privacy in the United Kingdom
Language
English (en)
Date of Award
5-1-2020
Author's Department
International and Area Studies
Degree Name
Bachelor of Arts (A.B.)
Restricted/Unrestricted
Restricted
Abstract
A Senior Honors Thesis on the Formation of Public Opinion of Government Surveillance in the United Kingdom, 1990-2016. This paper examines fear of crime and concern for civil liberties as factors that shaped public opinion of government surveillance in the United Kingdom from 1990-2016. During this time, public opinion of surveillance was mostly positive, reflecting the belief that surveillance was a powerful crime-fighting and public safety tool. Critiques relating to surveillance’s potential to infringe on civil liberties, specifically the human right of privacy, were less influential on public opinion. Even as concerns about privacy rights garnered more attention in recent surveillance discourses in the media and in policymaking, existing patterns of surveillance had become so normalized that public opinion did not change significantly or lead to meaningful policy changes. This paper analyzes the dominance of perceived safety over privacy rights in the formation of public opinion of government surveillance and highlights the normalization of penetrative surveillance systems at the expense of active civic discourse around surveillance policy and privacy rights.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7936/2wwj-8q81
Mentor
Jeremy Caddel
Recommended Citation
Neaher, Giulia, "Public Opinion of Surveillance: Balancing Public Safety and Individual
Privacy in the United Kingdom" (2020). Senior Honors Papers / Undergraduate Theses. 223.
The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.7936/2wwj-8q81
Comments
Accessibility Notice: This document is a scanned text that has been automatically processed using Python's Tesseract Optical Character Recognition (OCR) engine to provide a text alternative for assistive software. Formatting or character recognition discrepancies may exist.