This item is accessible only to the Washington University community.
Off-Campus WUSTL Users: Click the “Off-Campus Download” button below. You will be prompted to log in using your WUSTL Key.
Language
English (en)
Date of Award
5-1-2025
Author's Department
International and Area Studies
Degree Name
Bachelor of Arts (A.B.)
Restricted/Unrestricted
Restricted
Abstract
The Olympic Games face a growing crisis as cities increasingly withdraw from hosting bids due to concerns over costs, urban disruption, and unmet promises. Olympic legacy is defined as the tangible and intangible effects of hosting, with a particular focus on how these outcomes impact local residents before, during, and after the Games. This thesis examines the patterns of Olympic legacy success and failure across host cities, focusing on the balance between resident interests and the demands of the International Olympic Committee (IOC). By analyzing the nine Summer Olympic Games from 1984 to 2016, this study explores how resident-centric planning contributes to a positive long-term legacy. The research highlights that cities prioritizing local needs tend to achieve stronger legacies. The study develops a framework for evaluating Olympic success based on five key structural changes: social development, urban infrastructure development, economic enhancement, environmental enhancement, and human development. Using qualitative analysis, this research assesses how host cities have either fulfilled or failed to meet their promises. The findings suggest that standardizing Olympic legacy evaluation is crucial for future bids and for sustaining the Games' relevance. Ultimately, this thesis argues that a city's Olympic success is determined by how residents perceive and remember the Games, making their voices central to any meaningful assessment of Olympic legacy.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7936/8mzw-qk91
Mentor
Zachary Bowersox
Recommended Citation
Pridgen, Virginia, "What Makes a Golden Olympic Legacy?" (2025). Senior Honors Papers / Undergraduate Theses. 255.
The definitive version is available at https://doi.org/10.7936/8mzw-qk91
Comments
Accessibility Notice: This document is a scanned text that has been automatically processed using Python's Tesseract Optical Character Recognition (OCR) engine to provide a text alternative for assistive software. Formatting or character recognition discrepancies may exist.